2003 Galerie SOL,Tokyo Penetrating Paintings: Pierced Surface, Middle Layer, and DepthsAkatsu Tadashi, Art critic, ex-reporter for Asahi Shimbun Suganuma Minoru has changed, evolved, and deepened. He has pioneered
a new horizon of painting. This is the feeling I have had since I saw his
latest gigantic work "Penetration I". The painting is his
overwhelming expression itself and never lets us take our eyes off. The
multi-layered colour distinctions that contain diverse expressions and the
close balance expressed by such distinctions together show dynamism in his work
and make us strongly feel its attractiveness. An act of his free hands that are
released from pressure expands the space and invites the sense of being free.
The red colour moving forward and backward in our retinas eventually repeats
its expansion and contraction movements in the whole space. His extraordinary
powerful and magnanimous expressions infinitely multiply the image, expanding
the sense of infinity of floating.
2006 Galerie SOL, Tokyo Light and Object DEHARA Hitoshi Once
this great work of Suganuma Minoru comes before our eyes, it makes us feel like watching something like an
organ enlarged from its inside or being inside of it. His work has a little declining shadow running
vertically in the center, making two curved surfaces come up limitlessly.
However, the composition of its shape is indistinct as a whole. Its center looks like emitting
low light while its periphery is a little dark. Three
or four years have passed since Suganuma shifted from the “Paraphrase” series
of works to those of “Penetration”. More than 60 works have been produced
during the period. Now, space and shapes have been reduced to a state close to a surface, despite folds being intertwined, through the process from a two-layer structure of the former to a screen at the
initial stage of the latter, in which several patches of images are juxtaposed with once
another. “Penetration”
originally means “going inside”. The inside exists as the outside does, and a
border lies between them. In this series, the border is placed parallel to the
screen, that is, on the front. Needless to say, there is a kind of bias or
delay in the border when an object enters. Here, light leaks out of something
like a film, leading to a mixture or intertwining of light and an object. Painting
itself is an object for sure. Suganuma is
conscious of this and struggles with paints, using his hands (and hand gloves)
and cloths. The “Penetration” series
seems to strongly remind us of a material sense with its red color, although it
also has some works mainly using yellow. On the other hand, light itself is
ultimate in illusion in painting. Painting expresses brightness stronger than
chromatic values. However,
what makes it possible is not only a conversion of a color at the light but
also the composition of the whole screen. The whole color has to be perceived
as a certain image. It is worth remembering that the system of light and shadow
was developed slightly after the heyday of Western paintings, which spanned
from the Renaissance to the Baroque, and the three-dimensional illusion system.
We are living in the time when light of paintings speaks for itself, but a
color was nothing other than a color before the heyday,
although
there were some exceptions. In other words, a
light and shadow illusion is established on the base of a deep illusion space
and consciousness toward the space. In
these Suganuma’s works, guttering of paints and the texture showing
a sign of cloths and hands (and hand gloves) are easily visible, making us
confirm that he maintains material planarity. However, on the other hand, a certain
image emerges in the illusion space, although abstract. The image is free from
a surface as a given material. Painting is not a
mere two-dimensional art or three-dimensional illusion, as seen in the
materiality and the emergence of an image therefrom. His works are as close to
two dimension as possible on one hand, but it is possibly an art as experience,
in which two dimension and illusionary three
dimension are intricately added with each other on the other hand. Thus, his
works generate light as value. Suganuma
has shifted to the current method of laminating colors in this series from a
stain method or that of using translucency of colors. This is seemingly because
he tried to change the relations between the materiality and image of paints.
The low light actually comes from a white color that mainly forms the front
layer. The light is quietly emitted like a miracle from the state that a
material has been transmigrated to an image somewhere. It
may be said that the “Penetration” series is a self-referential painting in a
sense to expose its essence. However, this is based on the point that paintings
contain something transcending a self like light by nature. A shoji, sliding paper door, transmits
light like the film of his painting, beyond which darkness still exists. Like
this, space beyond the border is just something suggested. His light exists in the transcedence. I am sure that, while at least continuing
self-examination, Suganuma is
trying to track back the (mainly Western) history of paintings again, although
I am not sure if he may be regarded as modernist. He points to the axis of history
of the past, present and future in the structure of this series because of his
orientation to the history of paintings themselves. On the other hand, it seems
that his stance is linked to the point that the nature of human beings is
transcendence. “Penetration” is an analogon, a Greek word meaning analogy, of
human beings or their bodies, as well as of paintings. Therefore, it can even
stitch them together.
To the joy of light Works of Minoru Suganuma
may be placed as abstract, however they are concrete to me. That gentle
undulations in his color paintings of a same color system acts in concert with
the feeling of the viewers and gives the sense of flesh, just like the way we feel
a breeze with our skin. The title of his works, “Penetration” is a word
with ambiguity and has the meaning of permeation, passing through, breaking
through, insight and even the insertion of the sexual organs. When the artists
title their works, we need to be cautious not to think their titles describe
their works as they express indescribable words within their work. The waves advance swelling from inside of
Suganuma’s painting (from its outer skin or outer layer) is different from
ideology; rather the waves saturate each drama of our undulated feeling and
repeatedly match with our heartbeat and breathing. Some of the colors of his
works seem to be repeating just to confirm the changes that remind us of our
present time and space. His works are not ruled by one prominent color only,
rather layers of paints and various colors express the artist’s emotions as if swelling up to the surface of his work. At times those colors are vivid and they can
represent the events of our time. At the moment I saw his work
titled “Penetration 62” in
Jan.,2006, it reminded me of the sight of naked Iraqi soldiers who were
captives of Americans during the Iraqi war. It was surprising to see the materialness and
its close resemblance to this mass of flesh deprived of all humanity in the
work of Suganuma. The prominent color of the works are reds, they remind us
slightly of the touch as well as the shade of our skin and flesh although it
might be only me who thinks it to be so.
When the artist made these works, I wonder if he thought about it. But I am sure of the expression that becomes the mirror of the world we face. His work this time where yellow is the predominant color is different from
his previous one called “Penetration”. The element of
mortals is wiped away and changed into the expression of spiritually high. Suganuma may start dreaming of the world as genesis. 2009 Galerie SOL, Tokyo From Auschwitz to Delft. I went to see the Documenta of Kassel in summer 2002. But my impression
of the exposition has changed drastically when I went to Sachsenhausen.
The concentration camp, the suburbs of north Berlin, was a place where
medical experiments on human bodies were performed during WWU. My memory
is still vivid because of the cruelty humans are able to do to each other.
Eight years passed since I visited the concentration camp and I still am
affected by what happened there. I still have to come to terms with that
part of history. We visited
Auschwitz on the 27th of July 2009. It was a nice and dry morning. After
visiting Sachsenhausen and being aware of the suffering imposed on humans
there, I asked myself whether it was worth to continue to painting. I felt that
compared to what I saw there my work is but a very small contribution to this
world. However the joy I feel doing my work gives me the strength to continue.
After experiencing the negative heritage for humans, I wondered and ask myself
what can be left for us to be positive.. knowing my self-intoxication for the thought.. We moved to Birkenau in the afternoon. It is only a short time by bus from
Auschwitz. There are still some barracks standing in spite of the destruction
caused by the war. We passed through the arch made famous by the movie
“Schindler’s list”. On the arch, there is a writing which says ‘when you
enter this arch, your exit only as smoke’. The trains of death all passed
through this arch. We finished the tour and returned to Cracow at three
pm. I regret this is the place where Theodor Adorno said, “It is cruel
to write the poetry after Auschwitz ” . ("Cultural Criticism and Society"1951).
The site did not affect me as much. (though of course it depends on the
feeling we see it.) I started drawing on the 9th of August, the last day at the 5th World Art
Symposium in Delft. Anyway, I started by putting the paper on the rough
surface, rubbed the pencil on the paper in order to draw the texture of
concrete. I realized that there was no need to draw a form. I left the
atlier and used the same procedure on bricks, asphalt, woodskin and other
materials. As the frottage grew I realized that the representation of something
was created, but my pencils had expressed something entirely different.
I returned to atlier and erased again all I did until nothing was left,
but stained paper. I continued to erase and ask myself whether I could
continue to draw. Then, suddenly, the sentence “from Auschwitz to Delft”
came to my mind. This only is my own experience. But then, painting is
also only a personal experience after all. The theme; Is it possible to
paint after Auschwitz ? I have not found the answer yet. However I might
be able to paint because my hand is moving. Therefore in the end I understood
that : thinking and to act are not necessary the same.(26th Aug, 2009) 2010 Galerie SOL, Tokyo A memorized image and an abstraction.
|
Unlimited sky
Hitoshi Dehara
The curator, Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Art
It is interesting
to know that Minoru Suganuma titled his exposition “Sora (Sky)”.The title does
not imply a visual analogy between the painting and the sky. Rather, I feel
that the title “Sky” seems to imply unlimited freedom for his paintings.
When I saw his
principal work for the exposition, it is clear that his paintings were not painted
according to some regulations or definition. On the other hand, the paintings
do not express the artist’s memory, nor his feelings. I feel that his paintings
are free of elements that are not necessary to create paintings, and there are
no restrictions.
In addition to it,
there is no expression of reappearance of any kind on his paintings. Several
years ago, I wrote an essay for his exposition, titled “Penetration” and a
series of those paintings were abstract. They look just as if they were skins penetrated
by light and we could see the analogy. However, since then, Suganuma restrained
the effects of light gradually, and his paintings are tending to emphasize
reducibility more and more. After adding strokes of lighter colors on the
darker ones and using it as an undercoat we can see that the principal
paintings at this exposition have shades. This shadow does not imply light, but
more likely, implies nuances of colors. Otherwise I can say that, the “deepness”
in space expressed in his paintings as an extended metaphor. I guess that
creating these special nuances shows the particular creativity of Suganuma’s
paintings.
At a glance, his
paintings seem to be simple and anonymous, there is no doubt he creates his
work by balancing his experience and techniques to control all the elements in
regard to colors, forms and action. Thus, his paintings are anchored in the
space of illusion between reappearance of itself and reappearance of others.
The freedom of
this “Sora (Sky)” is, therefore, freedom based on suppression and moderation,
or the freedom accompanied by a total
loss of liberty just like two sides of a coin.
Related to this, I
would like to point out that Suganuma’s smaller works that were painted virtually
simultaneously with his big piece vary widely in regard to basic elements such
as arrangements of colors and directions of strokes. However, it does not mean
that I imply visual analogy even if his work reminds me of changing sky. My
interest goes to the fact that all of his paintings are interrelated. Suganuma suppresses
unnecessary expressions in each of his work and it seems he tries to balance
all this with versatility in his work. I think that there might be different
meanings for this interrelations.
Perhaps there might be a base in Suganuma's current paintings that expresses
freedom based on suppression and freedom of diversity.